Frameworks for Studying
20th Century Media
|
1: Culture Industry
/ Spectacle
- Modern media helps to drive
technological enabled institutionalized rationality (Adorno, Debord),
with one-way broadcast communication reflecting an essential asymmetry
of power;
- There's a plot to control
of the consumer, commodify the world (of Nature and feeling), resulting
in the "open-air prison" of an "administrated world."
- The spectator finds themselves
separated from the spectacle that engulfs them.
Example: The Mall as
the enlightened remaking of the World according to TV, Muzak, and comprehensive
security systems; what's lost? the Street as a publics space for politics,
dirt, resistance in a space which no one (everyone) owns.
Theorists: Adorno & Horkheimer, Mulvey, Debord, Weber, Baudrilliard |
|
2: McLuhan's
Media Theory
- Each medium is a "total"
environment, invisible but pervasive, and thus processes "that change
the content totally"
- Each medium reshapes the
sense ratio of those who inhabit that media environment, rewiring the
world as a "global village"
- Development: McLuhan begins
with a critique of American advertising as an appallingly total system,
then reinterprets this unity as an effect of media carrying a strongly
religious potential (of myth, of unity, of harmonization through a return
to the {oral, tactile} Africa within us all)
Comparative: McLuhan
braids together propositions that that resemble the ideas of 1st framework
(involuntary capture, invisibility, efficient totalizition) with a mythos
(retribalization; new sense ratios) that puts new media on the side
of (potential) liberation.
Example: The idea of the Internet circa 1994 (WWW as global
forced liberation) |
|
3: Cultural
Studies / Cultural History
- The coming of TV is not
imposed from above (whether through a cunning manipulation of the desires
of the audience or by political fiat), but instead it is "negotiated"
with those many social agents who make room for TV in their homes and
lives, and shape what gets produced by what they buy and how they use
it. [Lynn Spigel]
- Whatever the messages "encoded"
at the site of production, consumer-users exercise their cultural bias,
critical perspective, boredom and distraction to decode and reproduce
media within a reading that may be "dominant or hegemonic"; "negotiated,"
or "oppositional" [Stuart Hall]
Comparative: Resisting
the economic determinism of framework 1 and the techno-media determinism
of framework 2, the cultural studies framework understands culture to
be a "strong" and informing term, and history to carry considerable
momentum into every mutation of media.
Examples: Gay camp appropriations of Betty Davis and Toni Curtis;
Teens using beepers; Napster as software invention and user-led practice.
Theorists/ practitioners: Lyn Sigel (on TV), Start Hall |
Question (for next week): what difference does
the emergence of computable media make to the way one theorizes media?
|
|
overview | schedule
| assignments |student
pages | links | UCSB English
Return to Home Page for Professor Warner's class, Media
Culture (Department of English, UC/ Santa Barbara, 2003)
|