|    
          
        Frameworks for Studying 
        20th Century Media 
         
       | 
  
   
    
        1: Culture Industry 
        / Spectacle 
         
      
        - Modern media helps to drive 
          technological enabled institutionalized rationality (Adorno, Debord), 
          with one-way broadcast communication reflecting an essential asymmetry 
          of power; 
 
        - There's a plot to control 
          of the consumer, commodify the world (of Nature and feeling), resulting 
          in the "open-air prison" of an "administrated world."
 
        - The spectator finds themselves 
          separated from the spectacle that engulfs them. 
 
       
      Example: The Mall as 
        the enlightened remaking of the World according to TV, Muzak, and comprehensive 
        security systems; what's lost? the Street as a publics space for politics, 
        dirt, resistance in a space which no one (everyone) owns. 
        Theorists: Adorno & Horkheimer, Mulvey, Debord, Weber, Baudrilliard  | 
  
   
        | 
  
   
    |   2: McLuhan's 
        Media Theory 
      
        - Each medium is a "total" 
          environment, invisible but pervasive, and thus processes "that change 
          the content totally" 
 
        - Each medium reshapes the 
          sense ratio of those who inhabit that media environment, rewiring the 
          world as a "global village"
 
        - Development: McLuhan begins 
          with a critique of American advertising as an appallingly total system, 
          then reinterprets this unity as an effect of media carrying a strongly 
          religious potential (of myth, of unity, of harmonization through a return 
          to the {oral, tactile} Africa within us all)
 
       
      Comparative: McLuhan 
        braids together propositions that that resemble the ideas of 1st framework 
        (involuntary capture, invisibility, efficient totalizition) with a mythos 
        (retribalization; new sense ratios) that puts new media on the side 
        of (potential) liberation. 
        Example: The idea of the Internet circa 1994 (WWW as global 
        forced liberation)   | 
  
   
         | 
  
   
    |   3: Cultural 
        Studies / Cultural History  
      
        - The coming of TV is not 
          imposed from above (whether through a cunning manipulation of the desires 
          of the audience or by political fiat), but instead it is "negotiated" 
          with those many social agents who make room for TV in their homes and 
          lives, and shape what gets produced by what they buy and how they use 
          it. [Lynn Spigel]
 
        - Whatever the messages "encoded" 
          at the site of production, consumer-users exercise their cultural bias, 
          critical perspective, boredom and distraction to decode and reproduce 
          media within a reading that may be "dominant or hegemonic"; "negotiated," 
          or "oppositional" [Stuart Hall]
 
       
      Comparative: Resisting 
        the economic determinism of framework 1 and the techno-media determinism 
        of framework 2, the cultural studies framework understands culture to 
        be a "strong" and informing term, and history to carry considerable 
        momentum into every mutation of media. 
        Examples: Gay camp appropriations of Betty Davis and Toni Curtis; 
        Teens using beepers; Napster as software invention and user-led practice. 
         
        Theorists/ practitioners: Lyn Sigel (on TV), Start Hall  | 
  
   
       Question (for next week): what difference does 
      the emergence of computable media make to the way one theorizes media?  
          | 
  
   
       | 
        overview | schedule 
        | assignments |student 
        pages | links | UCSB English 
        Return to Home Page for Professor Warner's class, Media 
        Culture (Department of English, UC/ Santa Barbara, 2003)  
         |